Metagovernance, Network Structure, and Legitimacy: Developing a Heuristic for Comparative Governance Analysis

Carsten Daugbjerg, Paul Fawcett*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article develops a heuristic for comparative governance analysis. The heuristic depicts four network types by combining network structure with the state’s capacity to metagovern. It suggests that each network type produces a particular combination of input and output legitimacy. We illustrate the heuristic and its utility using a comparative study of agri-food networks (organic farming and land use) in four countries, which each exhibit different combinations of input and output legitimacy respectively. The article concludes by using a fifth case study to illustrate what a network type that produces high levels of input and output legitimacy might look like.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1223-1245
    Number of pages23
    JournalAdministration and Society
    Volume49
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Metagovernance, Network Structure, and Legitimacy: Developing a Heuristic for Comparative Governance Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this