Methodological development of a specific tool for assessing acceptability of assistive systems of powered two-wheeler-riders

Elisabeth Füssl, Manuel Oberlader, Vanessa Beanland, Ioanna Spyropoulou, Michael G. Lenné, Somya Joshi, Lars Rößger, Lars Leden, Geoff Underwood, Jose Carvalhais

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)


    Research on the acceptability of assistive systems for improving the safety of powered two-wheelers (PTWs) is a pressing issue. The use of safety-enhancing assistive systems for motorised vehicles, including advanced driver assistance systems and in-vehicle information systems is widespread in many countries. Yet, there is only a limited number of equivalent intelligent transport systems (ITS) for PTWs, namely advanced rider assistance systems and on-bike information systems. This study describes the methodological development of a specific tool for assessing motorcyclists' acceptability of ITS, as part of the motorcyclists' profiling questionnaire (MOPROQ). There were three stages of development. First, a literature review was undertaken to assess the current state of the art regarding ITS for PTWs and to determine the most relevant facets of acceptability that should be measured. Second, a series of focus group interviews were conducted to explore riders' attitudes towards ITS. Finally, the focus group results were used to develop a large-scale survey (MOPROQ), which was administered to an initial sample of over 6000 riders internationally. The designed tool can be used as a basis for the determination of rider acceptability of ITS systems in the future.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)12-21
    Number of pages10
    JournalIET Intelligent Transport Systems
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2015


    Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological development of a specific tool for assessing acceptability of assistive systems of powered two-wheeler-riders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this