Abstract
Methodological quality and transferability will be important issues for the credibility and usefulness of both published studies and administrative methods for evaluating the socio-economic value of marketed medicines in China. This paper critically examines factors commonly contributing to, or inhibiting, the quality and transferability of socio-economic evidence of the value of medicines, with specific reference to the Chinese community. It discusses appropriate approaches to design, performance, and reporting of published economic evaluation studies, as well as guides on assessment of quality of economic evaluations and recommends two internationally established methods that may be suitable for training in this setting.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 282-291 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2006 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Methods for socio-economic evaluation of marketed medicines III: Factors affecting methodological quality and transferability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver