Micro-level diversity and development of field-level legitimacy: A study of the U.S. animal lawsuits and law adoptions, 1865-2010

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

This study examines how stable legitimacy of animal welfare emerges when there are
multiple, diverse meanings at the micro level. I propose a multilayer model of legitimacy
development based on an inductive study of the U.S. animal lawsuits and adoption of animal
laws from 1865 to 2010. Network Analyses of animal lawsuits indicate that: 1) the persistent
discursive diversity in meaning is a precondition of cross-referencing among dissimilar issues of
animals; 2) it leads to a transitive network structure that furthers cross-referencing behavior
instead of hybridization; 3) the increasing cross-referencing enables each issue to retain the
equivalent level of discursive validity, and; 4) the emergence of a transitive cross-referencing
structure sustains the diversity at the micro level. The entire processes contribute to field-level
legitimacy of animal welfare, measured by the likelihood of animal law adoption. This inductive
study of animal lawsuits and animal law adoption suggests that stable legitimacy of animal
welfare emerges without either homogeneity or truce at the micro level. The results advance
current understanding of the field-level legitimacy development.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe 29th European Group for Organization Studies Colloquium
Number of pages42
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jul 2013
EventThe 29th European Group for Organization Studies Colloquium - Montréal, Canada
Duration: 4 Jul 20136 Jul 2013

Conference

ConferenceThe 29th European Group for Organization Studies Colloquium
Country/TerritoryCanada
CityMontréal
Period4/07/136/07/13

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Micro-level diversity and development of field-level legitimacy: A study of the U.S. animal lawsuits and law adoptions, 1865-2010'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this