Microstoria, Pacific history, and the question of scale: Two or three things that we should know about them

Dario Di Rosa*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article is prompted by the recent debate on the so-called crisis in the humanities, and the related call for historians to change direction by returning to history of the longue durée. While pointing out that the ‘crisis’ is more influenced by the changing political economy of the tertiary education sector than by specific historiographical practices, I suggest that small-scale analysis remains compatible with global history approaches. Articulating a parallel examination of Pacific historiography and the Italian variant of microhistory, the article argues that the latter provides fertile stimuli for Pacific history. In particular, I maintain that integrating social analysis can serve to counterbalance the over-emphasis on cultural aspects found in much Pacific historiography.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)25-43
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Pacific History
    Volume53
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Microstoria, Pacific history, and the question of scale: Two or three things that we should know about them'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this