Abstract
This study examines the usefulness of three accounting systems (cash, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) accrual, and Government Finance Statistics (GFS) accrual) for public sector decision-making. From a survey of internal users, external users, and preparers in Australia, we find that GAAP accrual information is perceived to be relatively more useful and understandable than the other two systems for most decisions examined. The relatively higher ratings for GAAP accrual information differ from earlier studies and may reflect an experience or familiarity effect whereby perceptions of usefulness are enhanced because respondents have become more used to the system. This effect might also explain the lower ratings for GFS accrual.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 267-298 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | Financial Accountability and Management |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2010 |
Externally published | Yes |