Mobilising for food sovereignty: The pitfalls of international human rights strategies and an exploration of alternatives

Emma Larking*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article considers the role played by the language of human rights in a global campaign for food sovereignty. Led initially by the international peasants’ movement, Vía Campesina, the campaign opposes the globalisation of agricultural markets and neoliberal interventions in food production. Alongside other strategies, the campaign makes creative use of human rights and also seeks their institutionalisation in a UN Declaration on the rights of peasants. An examination of how the campaign employs human rights reveals a more complicated process than that suggested by the theoretical polarisation of ‘top down’ and ‘bottom up’ accounts of rights development in the sociology of human rights. It demonstrates both wariness of state power and attempts to harness the power of the state against international forces. It also shows that a desire for legal reform co-exists with the struggle for more radical social and political transformations.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)758-777
    Number of pages20
    JournalInternational Journal of Human Rights
    Volume23
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 May 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mobilising for food sovereignty: The pitfalls of international human rights strategies and an exploration of alternatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this