TY - JOUR
T1 - Mobilizing personal narratives
T2 - The rise of digital “story banking” in U.S. grassroots advocacy
AU - Trevisan, Filippo
AU - Bello, Bryan
AU - Vaughan, Michael
AU - Vromen, Ariadne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2020/4/2
Y1 - 2020/4/2
N2 - This article interrogates digital “story banking,” a storytelling practice that has become increasingly popular among U.S. grassroots advocacy organizations. Through the examination of LinkedIn data and in-depth interviews with story banking professionals, this technique emerges as the centerpiece of the growing institutionalization, professionalization, and datafication of storytelling in progressive advocacy. Following the 2016 election, political crisis and an increasing awareness of changing information consumption patterns promoted story banking diffusion. Story banking ushers in the era of stories as data and political story on demand. Yet, political constraints currently limit story banking to a reactive approach based on news monitoring, algorithmic shortlisting of stories, and audience testing. Furthermore, an unresolved tension has emerged between the growing centralization of storytelling functions and the participatory potential of crowd-sourced story banks. The implications of these trends for progressive advocacy organizations and the groups they aim to represent are considered.
AB - This article interrogates digital “story banking,” a storytelling practice that has become increasingly popular among U.S. grassroots advocacy organizations. Through the examination of LinkedIn data and in-depth interviews with story banking professionals, this technique emerges as the centerpiece of the growing institutionalization, professionalization, and datafication of storytelling in progressive advocacy. Following the 2016 election, political crisis and an increasing awareness of changing information consumption patterns promoted story banking diffusion. Story banking ushers in the era of stories as data and political story on demand. Yet, political constraints currently limit story banking to a reactive approach based on news monitoring, algorithmic shortlisting of stories, and audience testing. Furthermore, an unresolved tension has emerged between the growing centralization of storytelling functions and the participatory potential of crowd-sourced story banks. The implications of these trends for progressive advocacy organizations and the groups they aim to represent are considered.
KW - Storytelling; story banking
KW - crowd-sourcing
KW - digital media
KW - grassroots advocacy
KW - mobilization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077057130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19331681.2019.1705221
DO - 10.1080/19331681.2019.1705221
M3 - Article
SN - 1933-1681
VL - 17
SP - 146
EP - 160
JO - Journal of Information Technology and Politics
JF - Journal of Information Technology and Politics
IS - 2
ER -