TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling the iron oxides and oxyhydroxides for the prediction of environmentally sensitive phase transformations
AU - Guo, Haibo
AU - Barnard, Amanda S.
PY - 2011/3/8
Y1 - 2011/3/8
N2 - Iron oxides and oxyhydroxides are challenging to model computationally as competing phases may differ in formation energies by only several kJ mol -1, they undergo magnetization transitions with temperature, their structures may contain partially occupied sites or long-range ordering of vacancies, and some loose structures require proper description of weak interactions such as hydrogen bonding and dispersive forces. If structures and transformations are to be reliably predicted under different chemical conditions, each of these challenges must be overcome simultaneously while preserving a high level of numerical accuracy and physical sophistication. Here we present comparative studies of structure, magnetization, and elasticity properties of iron oxides and oxyhydroxides using density-functional-theory calculations with plane-wave (PW) and locally-confined-atomic-orbital basis sets, which are implemented in vasp and siesta packages, respectively. We have selected hematite (α-Fe2O3), maghemite (γ-Fe2O3), goethite (α-FeOOH), lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH), and magnetite (Fe3O4) as model systems from a total of 13 known iron oxides and oxyhydroxides, and we used the same convergence criteria and almost equivalent settings to make consistent comparisons. Our results show that both basis sets can reproduce the energetic stability and magnetic ordering, and are in agreement with experimental observations. There are advantages to choosing one basis set over the other, depending on the intended focus. In our case, we find the method using PW basis set the most appropriate, and we combine our results to construct the first phase diagram of iron oxides and oxyhydroxides in the space of competing chemical potentials, generated entirely from first principles.
AB - Iron oxides and oxyhydroxides are challenging to model computationally as competing phases may differ in formation energies by only several kJ mol -1, they undergo magnetization transitions with temperature, their structures may contain partially occupied sites or long-range ordering of vacancies, and some loose structures require proper description of weak interactions such as hydrogen bonding and dispersive forces. If structures and transformations are to be reliably predicted under different chemical conditions, each of these challenges must be overcome simultaneously while preserving a high level of numerical accuracy and physical sophistication. Here we present comparative studies of structure, magnetization, and elasticity properties of iron oxides and oxyhydroxides using density-functional-theory calculations with plane-wave (PW) and locally-confined-atomic-orbital basis sets, which are implemented in vasp and siesta packages, respectively. We have selected hematite (α-Fe2O3), maghemite (γ-Fe2O3), goethite (α-FeOOH), lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH), and magnetite (Fe3O4) as model systems from a total of 13 known iron oxides and oxyhydroxides, and we used the same convergence criteria and almost equivalent settings to make consistent comparisons. Our results show that both basis sets can reproduce the energetic stability and magnetic ordering, and are in agreement with experimental observations. There are advantages to choosing one basis set over the other, depending on the intended focus. In our case, we find the method using PW basis set the most appropriate, and we combine our results to construct the first phase diagram of iron oxides and oxyhydroxides in the space of competing chemical potentials, generated entirely from first principles.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/79960978540
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.094112
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.094112
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79960978540
SN - 1098-0121
VL - 83
JO - Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
JF - Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
IS - 9
M1 - 094112
ER -