Modeling the mental health service utilization decisions of university undergraduates: A discrete choice conjoint experiment

Charles E. Cunningham*, Robert B. Zipursky, Bruce K. Christensen, Peter J. Bieling, Victoria Madsen, Heather Rimas, Stephanie Mielko, Fiona Wilson, Ivana Furimsky, Lisa Jeffs, Catharine Munn

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: We modeled design factors influencing the intent to use a university mental health service. Participants: Between November 2012 and October 2014, 909 undergraduates participated. Method: Using a discrete choice experiment, participants chose between hypothetical campus mental health services. Results: Latent class analysis identified three segments. A Psychological/Psychiatric Service segment (45.5%) was most likely to contact campus health services delivered by psychologists or psychiatrists. An Alternative Service segment (39.3%) preferred to talk to peer-counselors who had experienced mental health problems. A Hesitant segment (15.2%) reported greater distress but seemed less intent on seeking help. They preferred services delivered by psychologists or psychiatrists. Simulations predicted that, rather than waiting for standard counseling, the Alternative Service segment would prefer immediate access to E-Mental health. The Usual Care and Hesitant segments would wait 6 months for standard counseling. Conclusions: E-Mental Health options could engage students who may not wait for standard services.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)389-399
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of American College Health
    Volume65
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 18 Aug 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling the mental health service utilization decisions of university undergraduates: A discrete choice conjoint experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this