TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling the mental health service utilization decisions of university undergraduates
T2 - A discrete choice conjoint experiment
AU - Cunningham, Charles E.
AU - Zipursky, Robert B.
AU - Christensen, Bruce K.
AU - Bieling, Peter J.
AU - Madsen, Victoria
AU - Rimas, Heather
AU - Mielko, Stephanie
AU - Wilson, Fiona
AU - Furimsky, Ivana
AU - Jeffs, Lisa
AU - Munn, Catharine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis © 2017, © Charles E. Cunningham, Robert B. Zipursky, Bruce K. Christensen, Peter J. Bieling, Victoria Madsen, Heather Rimas, Stephanie Mielko, Fiona Wilson, Ivana Furimsky, Lisa Jeffs and Catharine Munn.
PY - 2017/8/18
Y1 - 2017/8/18
N2 - Objective: We modeled design factors influencing the intent to use a university mental health service. Participants: Between November 2012 and October 2014, 909 undergraduates participated. Method: Using a discrete choice experiment, participants chose between hypothetical campus mental health services. Results: Latent class analysis identified three segments. A Psychological/Psychiatric Service segment (45.5%) was most likely to contact campus health services delivered by psychologists or psychiatrists. An Alternative Service segment (39.3%) preferred to talk to peer-counselors who had experienced mental health problems. A Hesitant segment (15.2%) reported greater distress but seemed less intent on seeking help. They preferred services delivered by psychologists or psychiatrists. Simulations predicted that, rather than waiting for standard counseling, the Alternative Service segment would prefer immediate access to E-Mental health. The Usual Care and Hesitant segments would wait 6 months for standard counseling. Conclusions: E-Mental Health options could engage students who may not wait for standard services.
AB - Objective: We modeled design factors influencing the intent to use a university mental health service. Participants: Between November 2012 and October 2014, 909 undergraduates participated. Method: Using a discrete choice experiment, participants chose between hypothetical campus mental health services. Results: Latent class analysis identified three segments. A Psychological/Psychiatric Service segment (45.5%) was most likely to contact campus health services delivered by psychologists or psychiatrists. An Alternative Service segment (39.3%) preferred to talk to peer-counselors who had experienced mental health problems. A Hesitant segment (15.2%) reported greater distress but seemed less intent on seeking help. They preferred services delivered by psychologists or psychiatrists. Simulations predicted that, rather than waiting for standard counseling, the Alternative Service segment would prefer immediate access to E-Mental health. The Usual Care and Hesitant segments would wait 6 months for standard counseling. Conclusions: E-Mental Health options could engage students who may not wait for standard services.
KW - College students
KW - discrete choice experiment
KW - mental health
KW - service utilization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020185573&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07448481.2017.1322090
DO - 10.1080/07448481.2017.1322090
M3 - Article
SN - 0744-8481
VL - 65
SP - 389
EP - 399
JO - Journal of American College Health
JF - Journal of American College Health
IS - 6
ER -