Modelling aggregate demand for labour: A critique of Lewis and MacDonald

Steve Dowrick*, Graeme Wells

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In a recent contribution to this journal, Lewis and MacDonald (2002) argue that Australian literature on aggregate demand for labour is permeated with misunderstandings and, as a result, existing empirical work has been misinterpreted. The objective of the present note is to argue that the interpretation of existing empirical studies, to the extent that they are based on a CES production technology, is broadly correct. We demonstrate that Lewis and McDonald have no basis for estimating anything more than the partial elasticity of labour demand, holding output constant, because their single-equation estimation does not identify the elasticity of demand for output.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)436-440
    Number of pages5
    JournalEconomic Record
    Volume80
    Issue number251
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Modelling aggregate demand for labour: A critique of Lewis and MacDonald'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this