Models of political accountability and concepts of Australian government

Marian Simms

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Models of political accountability are drawn from views about the nature of government. Too often, however, these views are flawed and/or not made explicit. In particular, the traditional model of government accountability - which will be outlined below -misunderstands the British 'parent' system of responsible government. One immediate task for those interested in accountability is to map the basic features of the Australian system (best understood as 'executive federalism') in order to provide foundations for new accountability models. As well as delaying the map drawing task, the dominance of the traditional account has also 'crowded out' other concepts of accountability. The 'efficiency' and 'democracy' approaches will be discussed below as basically complementary addition to the current Australian debate over accountability. It is thus argued here that a more eclectic approach drawing from diverse but longstanding strands in the public administration tradition can not only enrich the debate but also help to throw light on new public policy developments such as contracting out.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)34-38
    Number of pages5
    JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
    Volume58
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 1999

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Models of political accountability and concepts of Australian government'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this