Modern slavery disclosures in mining: a comparison of large UK and Australian companies

Katherine L. Christ, Roger Burritt, Heather Prider

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    With growing interest in eradication of modern slavery in operations and supply chains the purpose of the paper is to explore disclosures of the top ten listed mining companies in the UK and Australia. Institutional theory provides the foundation for a first examination of comparative modern slavery disclosures in these two countries, at the time one with and one without disclosure legislation. Based on qualitative thematic analysis, major results indicate the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 to be a catalyst for disclosures made by the sample of UK mining companies, whereas in Australia where no modern slavery legislation was in place, normative and mimetic institutional pressure is not viewed as important and the companies seemed underprepared for impending legislative changes. The paper concludes that transparency based legislation on modern slavery can provide a powerful coercive influence for change, strengthening other forms of normative and mimetic pressure.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)23-40
    JournalJournal of Behavioural Economics and Social Systems
    Volume4
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Modern slavery disclosures in mining: a comparison of large UK and Australian companies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this