Abstract
There is currently international interest in the development of political staff structures in different countries. The question explored in this paper is: why did Australias distinctive institution develop in the way that it did at the time it did? New advisory arrangements occurred earlier than in most other Westminster countries and were wholly partisan, instead of a mix of partisan and non-partisan staff. Looking at historical factors relating to the nature of the public service and the experience of ministers in the 1970s and 1980s explains why the institution developed as it did. The paper applies historical institutionalism as a framework and traces the factors that led to the creation of a new institution in Australia, rather than the adaptive response seen in most of the other Westminster nations. The paper argues that historical institutionalism is a useful lens through which to view the development of the Australian ministerial office.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Online |
Place of Publication | Perth |
Publisher | Australian Political Studies Association |
Pages | 1-14 |
Edition | Peer Reviewed |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Event | Australian Political Studies Association Annual Conference 2013 (APSA) - Perth Australia, Australia Duration: 1 Jan 2013 → … http://www.apsa2013.com/peer-reviewed-full-papers |
Conference
Conference | Australian Political Studies Association Annual Conference 2013 (APSA) |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Australia |
Period | 1/01/13 → … |
Other | September 30 - October 2 2013 |
Internet address |