Momentum profits in the Australian equity market: A matched firm approach

Jenni L. Bettman, Thomas R.B. Maher, Stephen J. Sault*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper examines momentum trading strategies within the Australian equity market over the period 1990 to 2007, inclusive. We analyse excess returns employing both Jegadeesh and Titman's (Jegadeesh, N., Titman, S., 1993. "Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency". The Journal of Finance, 48:65-91) zero cost investment portfolio approach and a matched control firm approach. We also allow for short sale restrictions, liquidity constraints and transaction costs in the form of bid-ask spreads. Testing reveals that both the Jegadeesh and Titman (Jegadeesh, N., and Titman, S. (1993). "Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency". The Journal of Finance, 48:65-91.) zero cost investment portfolio approach and the matched control firm approach yield excess profits. While the implementation of short sale restraints increases momentum profitability, the subsequent inclusion of bid-ask spreads results in a reduction in these gains. Further, we find that executing a momentum strategy in Australia results in statistically significant dollar profits.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)565-579
    Number of pages15
    JournalPacific Basin Finance Journal
    Volume17
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Momentum profits in the Australian equity market: A matched firm approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this