More partners, more ranges: Generalist legumes spread more easily around the globe

Tia L. Harrison*, Anna K. Simonsen, John R. Stinchcombe, Megan E. Frederickson

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    27 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    How does mutualism affect range expansion? On the one hand, mutualists might thrive in new habitats thanks to the resources, stress tolerance or defence provided by their partners. On the other, specialized mutualists might fail to find compatible partners beyond their range margins, limiting further spread. A recent global analysis of legume ranges found that non-symbiotic legumes have been successfully introduced to more ranges than legumes that form symbioses with rhizobia, but there is still abundant unexplained variation in introduction success within symbiotic legumes. We test the hypothesis that generalist legumes have spread to more ranges than specialist legumes. We used published data and rhizobial 16S rRNA sequences from GenBank to quantify the number of rhizobia partners that associate with 159 legume species, spanning the legume phylogeny and the globe. We found that generalist legumes occur in more introduced ranges than specialist legumes, suggesting that among mutualists, specialization hinders range expansions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number20180616
    JournalBiology Letters
    Volume14
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'More partners, more ranges: Generalist legumes spread more easily around the globe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this