Mothering after Moomba: Labelling, secondary stigma and maternal efficacy in the post-settlement context

Sara Maher, Jarrett Blaustein*, Kathryn Benier, Joseph Chitambo, Diana Johns

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Parenting can impact young people’s justice system involvement but there is a scarcity of research that examines how parenting practices, specifically mothering, are influenced by labelling processes. Accordingly, this article considers how the labelling of young people from forced migration backgrounds as criminals impacted mothering and maternal efficacy during a ‘law and order crisis’ in Melbourne, Australia. Drawing on interviews and focus groups with mothers and young people of South Sudanese heritage, we illustrate how this hostile social climate generated secondary stigma, and amplified anxieties and concerns about inclusivity and belonging. The research advances our theoretical understanding of parental control and parental efficacy in the post-settlement context by bringing the gendered experiences of mothers as providers of supervision and support into focus. It suggests labelling may undermine maternal efficacy and exacerbate intercultural and intergenerational tensions, but that community involvement may support parents and mitigate the risk of deviance amplification.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)304-325
    Number of pages22
    JournalTheoretical Criminology
    Volume26
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mothering after Moomba: Labelling, secondary stigma and maternal efficacy in the post-settlement context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this