Multifocal perineural invasion is a better prognosticator than depth of invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Shaheen Hasmat*, Ardalan Ebrahimi, Kan Gao, Tsu Hui Low, Carsten Palme, Ruta Gupta, Jonathan Clark

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives: Prognostic significance of perineural invasion (PNI) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) characterized as unifocal and multifocal was compared to depth of invasion (DOI) and extranodal extension (ENE). Materials and Methods: Univariable and multivariable analyses of 861 consecutive patients with OSCC undergoing treatment between 1995 and 2018 were performed, with local failure (LF) and disease-specific mortality (DSS) as the primary endpoints. Results: After adjusting for other adverse histopathological factors and adjuvant therapy, multifocal PNI was associated with a greater risk of LF (P =.01) and DSS (P = 0.02) compared to DOI. The effect of multifocal PNI was comparable to the effect of nodal metastases without ENE (P = 0.02). LF and DSS were not improved by the administration of adjuvant radiotherapy within unifocal or multifocal PNI groups. Conclusion: Multifocal PNI is associated with a greater risk of death in OSCC than DOI. Its effect is comparable to that of nodal metastases (without ENE).

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3992-3999
    Number of pages8
    JournalHead and Neck
    Volume41
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Multifocal perineural invasion is a better prognosticator than depth of invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this