Mundari and argumentation in word-class analysis

Nicholas Evans*, Toshiki Osada

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

1. Introduction: Our three commentators raise such a host of deep and interesting issues that we cannot hope to answer them all within the time and space at our disposal. To begin with, we would like to thank them for pushing us to articulate the reasons for our arguments more clearly, and for getting us to spell out a number of assumptions and intermediate argumentative steps that we did not make sufficiently clear or explicit in our original article. We will deal with the three commentators one by one, limiting ourselves to a few key points.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)442-457
Number of pages16
JournalLinguistic Typology
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mundari and argumentation in word-class analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this