Muscle dysmorphia and the DSM-V conundrum: Where does it belong? A review paper

Stuart B. Murray, Elizabeth Rieger, Stephen W. Touyz, Yolanda De La Garza García

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    168 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: Muscle dysmorphia is a relatively recently identified psychological condition that, since its inception, has been variously conceptualized as an eating disorder and subsequently as a type of body dysmorphic disorder within the somatoform disorders. This review aims to inform and encourage ongoing debate surrounding the diagnostic placement of this disorder. Method: We present a review and synthesis of the extant literature with a view to informing future decisions regarding the conceptualization of muscle dysmorphia. Results: The validity of muscle dysmorphia as a clinical entity has been empirically demonstrated. While the condition bears little semblance to somatization as currently conceptualized, the research suggests a strong conceptual similarity with anorexia nervosa. However, future research needs to utilize more appropriate measures of male eating disorder pathology. Muscle dysmorphia is also inclusive of obsessive compulsive features that are typical to those seen in eating disorder presentations. Discussion: We suggest that muscle dysmorphia be reanalyzed through the lens of an eating disorder spectrum. Recognition of muscle dysmorphia as an eating disorder may offer more clinical utility in recognizing the male experience of eating disorder pathology and also help reduce the number of current male cases falling into the EDNOS category.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)483-491
    Number of pages9
    JournalInternational Journal of Eating Disorders
    Volume43
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Muscle dysmorphia and the DSM-V conundrum: Where does it belong? A review paper'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this