Abstract
According to pluralism about some concept, there are multiple non-equivalent, legitimate concepts pertaining to the (alleged) ontological category in question. It is an open question whether conceptual pluralism implies anti-realism about that category. In this article, I argue that at least for the case of music, it does not. To undermine the application of an influential move from pluralism (about music concepts) to anti-realism (about the music category), then, I provide an argument in support of indifference realism about music, by appeal to music archaeological research, via an analogy with Adrian Currie’s indifference realism about species licensed by paleobiological research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 261-272 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Topoi |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Music Pluralism, Music Realism, and Music Archaeology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver