Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel lines

Wen Huang, Andreas Massouras, Yutaka Inoue, Jason Peiffer, Miquel Ràmia, Aaron M. Tarone, Lavanya Turlapati, Thomas Zichner, Dianhui Zhu, Richard F. Lyman, Michael M. Magwire, Kerstin Blankenburg, Mary Anna Carbone, Kyle Chang, Lisa L. Ellis, Sonia Fernandez, Yi Han, Gareth Highnam, Carl E. Hjelmen, John R. JackMehwish Javaid, Joy Jayaseelan, Divya Kalra, Sandy Lee, Lora Lewis, Mala Munidasa, Fiona Ongeri, Shohba Patel, Lora Perales, Agapito Perez, Ling Ling Pu, Stephanie M. Rollmann, Robert Ruth, Nehad Saada, Crystal Warner, Aneisa Williams, Yuan Qing Wu, Akihiko Yamamoto, Yiqing Zhang, Yiming Zhu, Robert R.H. Anholt, Jan O. Korbel, David Mittelman, Donna M. Muzny, Richard A. Gibbs, Antonio Barbadilla, J. Spencer Johnston, Eric A. Stone, Stephen Richards, Bart Deplancke, Trudy F.C. Mackay*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

437 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) is a community resource of 205 sequenced inbred lines, derived to improve our understanding of the effects of naturally occurring genetic variation on molecular and organismal phenotypes. We used an integrated genotyping strategy to identify 4,853,802 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 1,296,080 non-SNP variants. Our molecular population genomic analyses show higher deletion than insertion mutation rates and stronger purifying selection on deletions. Weaker selection on insertions than deletions is consistent with our observed distribution of genome size determined by flow cytometry, which is skewed toward larger genomes. Insertion/deletion and single nucleotide polymorphisms are positively correlated with each other and with local recombination, suggesting that their nonrandom distributions are due to hitchhiking and background selection. Our cytogenetic analysis identified 16 polymorphic inversions in the DGRP. Common inverted and standard karyotypes are genetically divergent and account for most of the variation in relatedness among the DGRP lines. Intriguingly, variation in genome size and many quantitative traits are significantly associated with inversions. Approximately 50% of the DGRP lines are infected with Wolbachia, and four lines have germline insertions of Wolbachia sequences, but effects of Wolbachia infection on quantitative traits are rarely significant. The DGRP complements ongoing efforts to functionally annotate the Drosophila genome. Indeed, 15% of all D. melanogaster genes segregate for potentially damaged proteins in the DGRP, and genome-wide analyses of quantitative traits identify novel candidate genes. The DGRP lines, sequence data, genotypes, quality scores, phenotypes, and analysis and visualization tools are publicly available.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1193-1208
Number of pages16
JournalGenome Research
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel lines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this