TY - JOUR
T1 - Navigating tensions in climate change-related planned relocation
AU - Gini, Giovanna
AU - Piggott-McKellar, Annah
AU - Wiegel, Hanne
AU - Neu, Friedrich Nikolaus
AU - Link, Ann Christine
AU - Fry, Claudia
AU - Tabe, Tammy
AU - Adegun, Olumuyiwa
AU - Wade, Cheikh Tidiane
AU - Bower, Erica Rose
AU - Koeltzow, Sarah
AU - Harrington-Abrams, Rachel
AU - Jacobs, Carolien
AU - van der Geest, Kees
AU - Zivdar, Narjes
AU - Alaniz, Ryan
AU - Cherop, Carolyne
AU - Durand-Delacre, David
AU - Pill, Melanie
AU - Shekhar, Himanshu
AU - Yates, Olivia
AU - Khan, Md Abdul Awal
AU - Nansam-Aggrey, Frank Kwesi
AU - Grant, Lauren
AU - Nizar, Danang Aditya
AU - Owusu-Daaku, Kwame Nitri
AU - Preato, Alberto
AU - Stefancu, Oana
AU - Yee, Merewalesi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024. corrected publication 2024.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - The planned relocation of communities away from areas of climate-related risk has emerged as a critical strategy to adapt to the impacts of climate change. Empirical examples from around the world show, however, that such relocations often lead to poor outcomes for affected communities. To address this challenge, and contribute to developing guidelines for just and sustainable relocation processes, this paper calls attention to three fundamental tensions in planned relocation processes: (1) conceptualizations of risk and habitability; (2) community consultation and ownership; and (3) siloed policy frameworks and funding mechanisms. Drawing on the collective experience of 29 researchers, policymakers and practitioners from around the world working on planned relocations in the context of a changing climate, we provide strategies for collectively and collaboratively acknowledging and navigating these tensions among actors at all levels, to foster more equitable and sustainable relocation processes and outcomes.
AB - The planned relocation of communities away from areas of climate-related risk has emerged as a critical strategy to adapt to the impacts of climate change. Empirical examples from around the world show, however, that such relocations often lead to poor outcomes for affected communities. To address this challenge, and contribute to developing guidelines for just and sustainable relocation processes, this paper calls attention to three fundamental tensions in planned relocation processes: (1) conceptualizations of risk and habitability; (2) community consultation and ownership; and (3) siloed policy frameworks and funding mechanisms. Drawing on the collective experience of 29 researchers, policymakers and practitioners from around the world working on planned relocations in the context of a changing climate, we provide strategies for collectively and collaboratively acknowledging and navigating these tensions among actors at all levels, to foster more equitable and sustainable relocation processes and outcomes.
KW - Climate adaptation
KW - Climate justice
KW - Climate risk
KW - Disaster risk reduction
KW - Loss and damage
KW - Managed retreat
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85195367577
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02059-8
U2 - 10.1007/s13280-024-02035-2
DO - 10.1007/s13280-024-02035-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 38847970
AN - SCOPUS:85195367577
SN - 0044-7447
VL - 53
SP - 1262
EP - 1266
JO - Ambio
JF - Ambio
IS - 9
ER -