Navigating the political landscape of Australian criminal justice reform: senior policy-makers on alternatives to incarceration

Melissa Lovell, Jill Guthrie, Paul Simpson, Tony Butler

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Political ideology and populism are often thought to be major impediments to criminal justice reform. Our research has attempted to deconstruct these ideas so that the robustness of the 'punitive turn' in criminal justice policy can be better understood. This article reports upon in-depth interviews conducted with five very senior criminal justice policy-makers, each of whom was broadly sympathetic to reforming criminal justice policy to achieve the goal of lower incarceration levels. The interviews reveal that these policy-makers conceived of prison reform primarily in terms of political risk, especially when reform was related to the adoption of prison alternatives and models that focus on 'decarceration'. Furthermore, policymakers' perceptions of political risk were intricately bound up with concerns about potential public policy and program failure. This research indicates the need to develop political will for reform, alongside the further development of the myriad evaluation and policy development processes required to enable successful reform in the criminal justice space.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)227-241
    JournalCurrent Issues in Criminal Justice
    Volume29
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Navigating the political landscape of Australian criminal justice reform: senior policy-makers on alternatives to incarceration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this