Abstract
This paper examines the contemporary debates among ‘neo-leftist’ and ‘neo- liberal’ Chinese intellectuals as a means of discussing strategies for intellectual criticism in a post-socialist world. While sympathetic towards the neo-leftist critique of neo-liberal views on markets, I argue that the neo-leftist refusal to reflect on the shortcomings of the Cultural Revolution leads to an unfortunate reproduction of Maoist rhetorical strategies in their writings. After examining some of these rhetorical strategies, I conclude by suggesting that a deconstruction of the category of liberalism itself offers greater promise for contemporary intellectual criticism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 239-251 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Intercultural Studies |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2003 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Neo-leftists versus neo-liberals: PRC intellectual debates in the 1990s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver