TY - JOUR
T1 - Neuroscience in gambling policy and treatment
T2 - an interdisciplinary perspective
AU - Yücel, Murat
AU - Carter, Adrian
AU - Allen, Amy R.
AU - Balleine, Bernard
AU - Clark, Luke
AU - Dowling, Nicki A.
AU - Gainsbury, Sally M.
AU - Goudriaan, Anna E.
AU - Grant, Jon
AU - Hayes, Alan
AU - Hodgins, David
AU - van Holst, Ruth
AU - Lattimore, Ralph
AU - Livingstone, Charles
AU - Lorenzetti, Valentina
AU - Lubman, Dan
AU - Murawski, Carsten
AU - Parkes, Linden
AU - Petry, Nancy
AU - Room, Robin
AU - Singh, Bruce
AU - Thomas, Anna
AU - Townshend, Phil
AU - Youssef, George
AU - Hall, Wayne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Neuroscientific explanations of gambling disorder can help people make sense of their experiences and guide the development of psychosocial interventions. However, the societal perceptions and implications of these explanations are not always clear or helpful. Two workshops in 2013 and 2014 brought together multidisciplinary researchers aiming to improve the clinical and policy-related effects of neuroscience research on gambling. The workshops revealed that neuroscience can be used to improve identification of the dangers of products used in gambling. Additionally, there was optimism associated with the diagnostic and prognostic uses of neuroscience in problem gambling and the provision of novel tools (eg, virtual reality) to assess the effectiveness of new policy interventions before their implementation. Other messages from these workshops were that neuroscientific models of decision making could provide a strong rationale for precommitment strategies and that interdisciplinary collaborations are needed to reduce the harms of gambling.
AB - Neuroscientific explanations of gambling disorder can help people make sense of their experiences and guide the development of psychosocial interventions. However, the societal perceptions and implications of these explanations are not always clear or helpful. Two workshops in 2013 and 2014 brought together multidisciplinary researchers aiming to improve the clinical and policy-related effects of neuroscience research on gambling. The workshops revealed that neuroscience can be used to improve identification of the dangers of products used in gambling. Additionally, there was optimism associated with the diagnostic and prognostic uses of neuroscience in problem gambling and the provision of novel tools (eg, virtual reality) to assess the effectiveness of new policy interventions before their implementation. Other messages from these workshops were that neuroscientific models of decision making could provide a strong rationale for precommitment strategies and that interdisciplinary collaborations are needed to reduce the harms of gambling.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012914678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30369-8
DO - 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30369-8
M3 - Review article
SN - 2215-0366
VL - 4
SP - 501
EP - 506
JO - The Lancet Psychiatry
JF - The Lancet Psychiatry
IS - 6
ER -