New fatherhood and psychological distress: A longitudinal study of Australian men

Liana S. Leach*, Sarah C. Olesen, Peter Butterworth, Carmel Poyser

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Despite growing interest and concern about men's mental health during the perinatal period, we still do not know whether men are more vulnerable to mental health problems during this time. The current study is one of the first to use longitudinal, population-based data to investigate whether becoming an expectant and/or new father is associated with increases in psychological distress. We analyzed 10 waves of data collected annually (from 2001 to 2010) from the nationally representative Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. Over this time, 349 men were identified as new fathers (first child aged <1 year), and 224 of these men had been identified as "expectant fathers" during the previous wave. A total of 1,658 men remained "never fathers." Psychological distress was measured using the 5-item Mental Health Inventory before the partner's pregnancy, during the partner's pregnancy, and during the first year of fatherhood. Longitudinal mixed models showed no significant increase in psychological distress as a function of expectant or new fatherhood; instead, some improvement in mental health was observed. The finding suggests that expectant and new fathers are not at greater risk of poor mental health. Future epidemiologic research should continue to identify those men who are most (and least) at risk during the perinatal period in order to target resources and assistance most effectively.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)582-589
    Number of pages8
    JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
    Volume180
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Sept 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'New fatherhood and psychological distress: A longitudinal study of Australian men'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this