Nitric oxide activates or inhibits skeletal muscle ryanodine receptors depending on its concentration, membrane potential and ligand binding

J. D.E. Hart*, A. F. Dulhunty

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    84 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We show that rabbit skeletal RyR channels in lipid bilayers can be activated or inhibited by NO, in a manner that depends on donor concentration, membrane potential and the presence of channel agonists. 10 μM S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine (SNAP) increased RyR activity at -40 mV within 15 sec of addition to the cis chamber, with a 2-fold increase in frequency of channel opening (F(o)). 10 μM SNAP did not alter activity at +40 mV and did not further activate RyRs previously activated by 2mM cis ATP at +40 or -40 mV. In contrast to the increase in F(o) with 10 μM SNAP, 1 mM SNAP caused a 2-fold reduction in F(o) but a 1.5-fold increase in mean open time (T(o)) at -40 mV in the absence of ATP. 1 mM SNAP or 0.5mM sodium nitroprusside (SNP) induced ~3-fold reductions in F(o) and T(o) at +40 or - 40 mV when channels were activated by 2 mM cis ATP or in channels activated by 6.5 μM peptide A at -40 mV (peptide A corresponds to part of the II-III loop of the skeletal dihydropyridine receptor). Both SNAP-induced activation and SNAP/SNP-induced inhibition were reversed by 2 mM dithiothreitol. The results suggest that S-Nitrosylation or oxidation of at least three classes of protein thiols by NO each produced characteristic changes in RyR activity. We propose that, in vivo, initial release of NO activates RyRs, but stronger release increases [NO] and inhibits RyR activity and contraction.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)227-236
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of Membrane Biology
    Volume173
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2000

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Nitric oxide activates or inhibits skeletal muscle ryanodine receptors depending on its concentration, membrane potential and ligand binding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this