TY - JOUR
T1 - No electrophysiological evidence for semantic processing during inattentional blindness
AU - Hutchinson, Brendan T.
AU - Jack, Bradley N.
AU - Pammer, Kristen
AU - Canseco-Gonzalez, Enriqueta
AU - Pitts, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/10/1
Y1 - 2024/10/1
N2 - A long-standing question concerns whether sensory input can reach semantic stages of processing in the absence of attention and awareness. Here, we examine whether the N400, an event related potential associated with semantic processing, can occur under conditions of inattentional blindness. By employing a novel three-phase inattentional blindness paradigm designed to maximise the opportunity for detecting an N400, we found no evidence for it when participants were inattentionally blind to the eliciting stimuli (related and unrelated word pairs). In contrast, participants noticed the same task-irrelevant word pairs when minimal attention was allocated to them, and a small N400 became evident. When the same stimuli were fully attended and relevant to the task, a robust N400 was observed. In addition to univariate ERP measures, multivariate decoding analyses were unable to classify related from unrelated word pairs when observers were inattentionally blind to the words, with decoding reaching above-chance levels only when the words were (at least minimally) attended. By comparison, decoding reached above-chance levels when contrasting word pairs with non-word stimuli, even when participants were inattentionally blind to these stimuli. Our results also replicated several previous studies by finding a “visual awareness negativity” (VAN) that distinguished task-irrelevant stimuli that participants noticed compared with those that were not perceived, and a P3b (or “late positivity”) that was evident only when the stimuli were task relevant. Together, our findings suggest that semantic processing might require at least a minimal amount of attention.
AB - A long-standing question concerns whether sensory input can reach semantic stages of processing in the absence of attention and awareness. Here, we examine whether the N400, an event related potential associated with semantic processing, can occur under conditions of inattentional blindness. By employing a novel three-phase inattentional blindness paradigm designed to maximise the opportunity for detecting an N400, we found no evidence for it when participants were inattentionally blind to the eliciting stimuli (related and unrelated word pairs). In contrast, participants noticed the same task-irrelevant word pairs when minimal attention was allocated to them, and a small N400 became evident. When the same stimuli were fully attended and relevant to the task, a robust N400 was observed. In addition to univariate ERP measures, multivariate decoding analyses were unable to classify related from unrelated word pairs when observers were inattentionally blind to the words, with decoding reaching above-chance levels only when the words were (at least minimally) attended. By comparison, decoding reached above-chance levels when contrasting word pairs with non-word stimuli, even when participants were inattentionally blind to these stimuli. Our results also replicated several previous studies by finding a “visual awareness negativity” (VAN) that distinguished task-irrelevant stimuli that participants noticed compared with those that were not perceived, and a P3b (or “late positivity”) that was evident only when the stimuli were task relevant. Together, our findings suggest that semantic processing might require at least a minimal amount of attention.
KW - Attention
KW - Consciousness
KW - Inattentional blindness
KW - N400
KW - P3
KW - Perception
KW - Semantic
KW - Visual awareness negativity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203012308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120799
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120799
M3 - Article
C2 - 39182710
AN - SCOPUS:85203012308
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 299
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
M1 - 120799
ER -