No link between nymph and adult coloration in shield bugs: weak selection by predators

Iliana Medina*, Regina Vega-Trejo, Thomas Wallenius, Damien Esquerré, Constanza León, Daniela M. Perez, Megan L. Head

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Many organisms use different antipredator strategies throughout their life, but little is known about the reasons or implications of such changes. For years, it has been suggested that selection by predators should favour uniformity in local warning signals. If this is the case, we would expect high resemblance in colour across life stages in aposematic animals where young and adults share similar morphology and habitat. In this study, we used shield bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomoidea) to test whether colour and colour diversity evolve similarly at different life stages. Since many of these bugs are considered to be aposematic, we also combined multi-species analyses with predation experiments on the cotton harlequin bug to test whether there is evidence of selection for uniformity in colour across life stages. Overall, we show that the diversity of colours used by both life stages is comparable, but adults are more cryptic than nymphs. We also demonstrate that nymphs and adults of the same species do not tend to look alike. Experiments on our model system suggest that predators can generalise among life stages that look different, and exhibit strong neophobia. Altogether, our results show no evidence of selection favouring colour similarity between adults and nymphs in this speciose clade.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number20201011
    JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
    Volume287
    Issue number1929
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 24 Jun 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'No link between nymph and adult coloration in shield bugs: weak selection by predators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this