Normative foundations of technology transfer and transnational benefit principles in the UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights

Thomas Alured Faunce, Hitoshi Nasu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The United Nations Scientific, Education, and Cultural Organization Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBHR) expresses in its title and substance a controversial linkage of two normative systems: international human rights law and bioethics. The UDBHR has the status of what is known as a "nonbinding" declaration under public international law. The UDBHR's foundation within bioethics (and association, e.g., with virtue-based or principlist bioethical theories) is more problematic. Nonetheless, the UDBHR contains socially important principles of technology transfer and transnational benefit (articles 14, 15, and 21). This paper is one of the first to explore how the disciplines of bioethics and international human rights law may interact in the UDBHR to advance the policy relevance and health impact of such principles. It investigates their normative ancestry in the UDBHR, as well as relevant conceptual differences between bioethics and public international law in this respect, and how these may be relevant to their conceptual evolution and application.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)296-321
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Medicine and Philosophy
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Normative foundations of technology transfer and transnational benefit principles in the UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this