Abstract
This essay utilises the representation of publics in William Shakespeares Roman plays to reflect on Shakespearean pedagogy and questions of public value. Through the use of a complexivist framework, this essay demonstrates how distinct areas of enquirythe publics of Shakespeares Roman plays and pedagogical theorycan usefully illuminate each other and reflect on questions of Shakespeare as a public good. Peripheral publics in Titus Andronicus supply a model for transmission-style pedagogical frameworks; the publics of Julius Caesar and the networks of Antony and Cleopatra demonstrate the complexity of educational systems; and, finally, the representation of the people in Coriolanus interrogates the conceptualisation of the public and problematises notions of public value in Shakespeare and in higher education.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | Jan-13 |
| Journal | Cogent Arts & Humanities |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"Not Stones but Men": Publics and Pedagogy in Shakespeare's Roman Plays'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver