Abstract
This article examines whether Australian languages generally lack clear noun phrase structures, as has sometimes been argued in the literature. We break up the notion of NP constituency into a set of concrete typological parameters, and analyse these across a sample of 100 languages, representing a significant portion of diversity on the Australian continent. We show that there is little evidence to support general ideas about the absence of NP structures, and we argue that it makes more sense to typologize languages on the basis of where and how they allow "classic" NP construal, and how this fits into the broader range of construals in the nominal domain.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 25-80 |
Number of pages | 56 |
Journal | Linguistic Typology |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |