TY - JOUR
T1 - Objects but not concepts modulate the size of the attended region
AU - Goodhew, Stephanie C.
AU - Edwards, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © 2016 The Experimental Psychology Society.
PY - 2017/7/3
Y1 - 2017/7/3
N2 - Here we investigated the types of stimuli that modulate the size of the attentional spotlight. In particular, it has been previously shown that conceptual cues that either directly refer to or are semantically related to particular spatial locations can shift attention to that location (known as “conceptual cueing”). For example, reading the word sun or joy can shift attention upward whereas the word boot or hostile can shift attention downward. Here, therefore, we tested whether words could modulate the size of the attended area. Across five experiments, we found that words that either directly referred to, or were abstractly associated with, particular sizes (small versus large) did not change the size of the attentional spotlight, whereas the presence of differently sized stimuli did, as evidenced by faster responses to targets when the spotlight is small than when it is large. This suggests that physical but not conceptual inducers can modulate the size of the attentional spotlight. This highlights an important difference between the regulation of spotlight size and shifts of attention, supporting the notion that they are subserved by distinct mechanisms.
AB - Here we investigated the types of stimuli that modulate the size of the attentional spotlight. In particular, it has been previously shown that conceptual cues that either directly refer to or are semantically related to particular spatial locations can shift attention to that location (known as “conceptual cueing”). For example, reading the word sun or joy can shift attention upward whereas the word boot or hostile can shift attention downward. Here, therefore, we tested whether words could modulate the size of the attended area. Across five experiments, we found that words that either directly referred to, or were abstractly associated with, particular sizes (small versus large) did not change the size of the attentional spotlight, whereas the presence of differently sized stimuli did, as evidenced by faster responses to targets when the spotlight is small than when it is large. This suggests that physical but not conceptual inducers can modulate the size of the attentional spotlight. This highlights an important difference between the regulation of spotlight size and shifts of attention, supporting the notion that they are subserved by distinct mechanisms.
KW - Attentional spotlight
KW - Conceptual cueing
KW - Spatial attention
KW - Visual attention
KW - Visual span
KW - Zoom-lens
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969160262&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2016.1183687
DO - 10.1080/17470218.2016.1183687
M3 - Article
SN - 1747-0218
VL - 70
SP - 1353
EP - 1365
JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
IS - 7
ER -