Occupancy of Australian office buildings: How accurate are typical assumptions used in energy performance simulation and what is the impact of inaccuracy

Aileen Marie Egan*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study investigates the impact of occupancy assumptions on the accurag of simulated energy performance of Australian office buildings in the design stage. The first part of this paper will present the results of occupancy surveys of a limited number of Australian office buildings performed by the author. The second part of the paper utilises the data from the occupancy surveys to quantify the difference between the predicted energy performance of buildings using a range of values for occupancy based on the surveys and the predicted energy performance of the same building models using the National Australian Built Environment Rating System (NABERS) occupancy assumptions. The study aims to determine if use of the NABERS assumptions causes significant distortions in modelled energy performance.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationASHRAE Transactions - Papers Presented at the 2012 ASHRAE Winter Conference in Chicago, Illinois
    PublisherASHRAE
    Pages217-224
    Number of pages8
    EditionPART 1
    ISBN (Print)9781936504220
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    Event2012 ASHRAE Winter Conference - Chicago, IL, United States
    Duration: 21 Jan 201225 Jan 2012

    Publication series

    NameASHRAE Transactions
    NumberPART 1
    Volume118
    ISSN (Print)0001-2505

    Conference

    Conference2012 ASHRAE Winter Conference
    Country/TerritoryUnited States
    CityChicago, IL
    Period21/01/1225/01/12

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Occupancy of Australian office buildings: How accurate are typical assumptions used in energy performance simulation and what is the impact of inaccuracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this