On ensuring that physicalism is not a dual attribute theory in sheep's clothing

Frank Jackson

doi:10.1007/s11098-006-5989-3

On ensuring that physicalism is not a dual attribute theory in sheep's clothing

Frank Jackson^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Physicalists are committed to the determination without remainder of the psychological by the physical, but are they committed to this determination being a priori? This paper distinguishes this question understood de dicto from this question understood de re, argues that understood de re the answer is yes in a way that leaves open the answer to the question understood de dicto.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	227-249
Number of pages	23
Journal	Philosophical Studies
Volume	131
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-5989-3
Publication status	Published - Oct 2006

Access to Document

10.1007/s11098-006-5989-3

Cite this

@article{fda69c21cf0b4ee0b91eaa6e945c4554,

title = "On ensuring that physicalism is not a dual attribute theory in sheep's clothing",

abstract = "Physicalists are committed to the determination without remainder of the psychological by the physical, but are they committed to this determination being a priori? This paper distinguishes this question understood de dicto from this question understood de re, argues that understood de re the answer is yes in a way that leaves open the answer to the question understood de dicto.",

author = "Frank Jackson",

year = "2006",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1007/s11098-006-5989-3",

language = "English",

volume = "131",

pages = "227--249",

journal = "Philosophical Studies",

issn = "0031-8116",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On ensuring that physicalism is not a dual attribute theory in sheep's clothing

AU - Jackson, Frank

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - Physicalists are committed to the determination without remainder of the psychological by the physical, but are they committed to this determination being a priori? This paper distinguishes this question understood de dicto from this question understood de re, argues that understood de re the answer is yes in a way that leaves open the answer to the question understood de dicto.

AB - Physicalists are committed to the determination without remainder of the psychological by the physical, but are they committed to this determination being a priori? This paper distinguishes this question understood de dicto from this question understood de re, argues that understood de re the answer is yes in a way that leaves open the answer to the question understood de dicto.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33749334909

U2 - 10.1007/s11098-006-5989-3

DO - 10.1007/s11098-006-5989-3

M3 - Article

SN - 0031-8116

VL - 131

SP - 227

EP - 249

JO - Philosophical Studies

JF - Philosophical Studies

IS - 1

ER -

On ensuring that physicalism is not a dual attribute theory in sheep's clothing

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this