On prediction in political science

Keith Dowding*, Charles Miller

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    24 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article discusses recent moves in political science that emphasise predicting future events rather than theoretically explaining past ones or understanding empirical generalisations. Two types of prediction are defined: pragmatic, and scientific. The main aim of political science is explanation, which requires scientific prediction. Scientific prediction does not necessarily entail pragmatic prediction nor does it necessarily refer to the future, though both are desiderata for political science. Pragmatic prediction is not necessarily explanatory, and emphasising pragmatic prediction will lead to disappointment, as it will not always help in understanding how to intervene to change future outcomes, and policy makers are likely to be disappointed by its time-scale.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1001-1018
    Number of pages18
    JournalEuropean Journal of Political Research
    Volume58
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On prediction in political science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this