Abstract
This chapter investigates the notions of self-awareness and no-self. It presents a discussion of the notions from Buddhist perspectives. As is evidenced by several Buddhist accounts of no-selfhood discussed in Siderits, Thompson and Zahavi (2011), there is no unified doctrine of no-self that is endorsed by all Buddhists. Consequently, it is a matter of debate as to how best to understand Buddhist notions of no-self and which no-self doctrine is or should be applicable to the phenomenology of martial artists who are 'in the act'. The chapter considers two Buddhist no-self doctrines: the no-self doctrine that can be found in the Nikayas and another that is discussed by the thirteenth century Japanese Zen Buddhist Dogen. The chapter shows a change of focus in considering no-selfhood. Moreover, the chapter demonstrates that, while Nikayas' no-self doctrine is not applicable to martial artists, Dogen's account accurately describes the phenomenology of martial artists.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Philosophy and the martial arts: engagement |
| Editors | Graham Priest and Damon Young |
| Place of Publication | New York |
| Publisher | Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group |
| Pages | 127-138 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Edition | 1st |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781138016590 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On self-awareness and the self'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver