Research output per year
Research output per year
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference Paper › peer-review
In this paper we study the computational complexity of several reasoning tasks centered around the bounded plan existence problem. We do this for standard classical planning and hierarchical task network (HTN) planning and each for a grounded and a lifted representation. Whereas bounded plan existence complexity is known for classical planning, it has not yet been studied for HTN planning. For plan verification, results were available for both formalisms except for the lifted HTN planning. We will present lower and upper bounds of the complexity of plan verification in lifted HTN planning and provide some new insights into its grounded counterpart, in which we show that verification is not just NP-complete in the general case, but already for a severely restricted special case. Finally, we show the complexity concerning verifying the optimality of a given plan and discuss its connection to the bounded plan existence problem.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence |
| Editors | Michael Wooldridge, Jennifer Dy, Sriraam Natarajan |
| Place of Publication | USA |
| Publisher | AAAI Press |
| Pages | 20203-20211 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Edition | 18 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-57735-887-9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 24 Mar 2024 |
| Event | 38th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2024 - Vancouver, Canada Duration: 20 Feb 2024 → 27 Feb 2024 |
| Name | Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence |
| ISSN (Print) | 2159-5399 |
| Conference | 38th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2024 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Canada |
| City | Vancouver |
| Period | 20/02/24 → 27/02/24 |
Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › peer-review