On the distribution of galaxy ellipticity in clusters

F. D'Eugenio*, R. C.W. Houghton, R. L. Davies, E. Dalla Bontà

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We study the distribution of projected ellipticity n(ε) for galaxies in a sample of 20 rich (Richness ≥ 2) nearby (z < 0.1) clusters of galaxies. We find no evidence of differences in n(ε), although the nearest cluster in the sample (the Coma Cluster) is the largest outlier (P(same) < 0.05). We then study n(ε) within the clusters, and find that ε increases with projected cluster-centric radius R (hereafter the ε-R relation). This trend is preserved at fixed magnitude, showing that this relation exists over and above the trend of more luminous galaxies to be both rounder and more common in the centres of clusters. The ε-R relation is particularly strong in the subsample of intrinsically flattened galaxies (ε > 0.4), therefore it is not a consequence of the increasing fraction of round slow rotator galaxies near cluster centers. Furthermore, the ε-R relation persists for just smooth flattened galaxies and for galaxies with deVaucouleurs-like light profiles, suggesting that the variation of the spiral fractionwith radius is not the underlying cause of the trend. We interpret our findings in light of the classification of early type galaxies (ETGs) as fast and slow rotators. We conclude that the observed trend of decreasing ε towards the centres of clusters is evidence for physical effects in clusters causing fast rotator ETGs to have a lower average intrinsic ellipticity near the centres of rich clusters.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)827-838
    Number of pages12
    JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
    Volume451
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On the distribution of galaxy ellipticity in clusters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this