On the Epistemic Bilking Argument

Brian Garrett

doi:10.1002/tht3.170

On the Epistemic Bilking Argument

Brian Garrett^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The standard bilking argument is well-known and attempts to prove the impossibility of backwards causation. In this discussion note, I identify an epistemic bilking argument, which has not received sufficient attention in the literature, and indicate how best to respond to it. This response involves a parity argument based on a forwards causation case.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	139-140
Number of pages	2
Journal	Thought
Volume	4
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.170
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2015

Access to Document

10.1002/tht3.170

Cite this

@article{8606c69d020e4a4cab7e2ac469c7f66d,

title = "On the Epistemic Bilking Argument",

abstract = "The standard bilking argument is well-known and attempts to prove the impossibility of backwards causation. In this discussion note, I identify an epistemic bilking argument, which has not received sufficient attention in the literature, and indicate how best to respond to it. This response involves a parity argument based on a forwards causation case.",

keywords = "Action, Backwards causation, Bilking, Reasons, Time",

author = "Brian Garrett",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc and the Northern Institute of Philosophy.",

year = "2015",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/tht3.170",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "139--140",

journal = "Thought",

issn = "2161-2234",

publisher = "John Wiley \& Sons Ltd.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Epistemic Bilking Argument

AU - Garrett, Brian

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - The standard bilking argument is well-known and attempts to prove the impossibility of backwards causation. In this discussion note, I identify an epistemic bilking argument, which has not received sufficient attention in the literature, and indicate how best to respond to it. This response involves a parity argument based on a forwards causation case.

AB - The standard bilking argument is well-known and attempts to prove the impossibility of backwards causation. In this discussion note, I identify an epistemic bilking argument, which has not received sufficient attention in the literature, and indicate how best to respond to it. This response involves a parity argument based on a forwards causation case.

KW - Action

KW - Backwards causation

KW - Bilking

KW - Reasons

KW - Time

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84941315936

U2 - 10.1002/tht3.170

DO - 10.1002/tht3.170

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 2161-2234

VL - 4

SP - 139

EP - 140

JO - Thought

JF - Thought

IS - 3

ER -

On the Epistemic Bilking Argument

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this