On the problem of discriminating between the tails of distributions

Chris C. Heyde, Khanhav Au

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In areas such as financial and insurance risk and communication network design the heaviness of the tail of the underlying distribution is crucial for the calculations. However, although it seems straightforward theoretically to distinguish between (say) exponential tails and power tails, this requires unexpectedly large samples in practice. Here we will use quantiles to compare the tails of distributions which are standardised to unit interquartile range to allow for possible infinite variance. We present some chi-squared tests of goodnessof- fit focussed on the tails. We also provide methods of quick comparison of distributions using counts over high thresholds and using extreme values.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationContributions to Probability and Statistics
    Subtitle of host publicationApplications and Challenges - Proceedings of the International Statistics Workshop
    PublisherWorld Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd
    Pages246-258
    Number of pages13
    ISBN (Print)9812703918, 9789812703910
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2006
    EventInternational Statistics Workshop on Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Applications and Challenges - Canberra, ACT, Australia
    Duration: 4 Apr 20055 Apr 2005

    Publication series

    NameContributions to Probability and Statistics: Applications and Challenges - Proceedings of the International Statistics Workshop

    Conference

    ConferenceInternational Statistics Workshop on Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Applications and Challenges
    Country/TerritoryAustralia
    CityCanberra, ACT
    Period4/04/055/04/05

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On the problem of discriminating between the tails of distributions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this