Abstract
Human trafficking has become a key site for intervention in global politics. Although anti-trafficking claims to mobilize resources for the combat against structural inequality within labour relations, anti-trafficking is intertwined with a fixation with the “trafficking survivor” resulting in notable individuated policy responses. Based on long-term ethnographic research of anti-trafficking interventions in the Mekong region, this essay suggest biolegitimacy is a fruitful heuristic device as it elucidates how anti-trafficking constructs “life” along multiple modalities and expressions. This in turn helps explain why anti-trafficking constitutes a mixed assemblage comprising actors with different ideological, moral and political positions. As such, anti-trafficking constitutes an important case study of how life legitimates and is legitimated within transitional networks of governance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 279-293 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Dialectical Anthropology |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2019 |