TY - JOUR
T1 - One-dimensional photogeneration profiles in silicon solar cells with pyramidal texture
AU - Baker-Finch, Simeon C.
AU - McIntosh, Keith R.
PY - 2012/1
Y1 - 2012/1
N2 - The key metric of surface texturing is the short-circuit current J sc. It depends on front surface transmittance, light trapping and the spatial profiles of photogeneration G and collection efficiency c. To take advantage of a one-dimensional profile of c(ζ), where ζ is the shortest distance to the p-n junction, we determine G(ζ) via ray tracing. This permits rigorous optical assessment of common pyramidal textures for various cell designs. When ζ is small, G(ζ) is largest beneath regular inverted pyramids, upright pyramids (regular or random) and planar surfaces, respectively. This higher G(ζ) results in superior collection of generated carriers in front-junction cells. In simulations of a conventional screen-print cell, 92.0% of generated carriers are collected for inverted pyramids, compared to 91.4% for upright pyramids, and 90.0% for a planar surface. Higher efficiency and rear junction devices are analysed in the paper. Despite differences in G(ζ) beneath textures, inverted pyramids achieve the highest J sc for all cell designs examined (marginally so for high-efficiency rear-contact cells) due to superior front surface transmittance and light trapping. We assess a common one-dimensional model for photogeneration beneath textured surfaces. This model underestimates G(ζ) when ζ is small, and overestimates G(ζ) when ζ is large. As a result, the generation current determined is inaccurate for thin substrates. It can be computed to within 3% error for 250 μm thick substrates. However, errors in G(ζ) can lead to 7.5% inaccuracy in calculations of J sc. Errors are largest for lower efficiency designs, in which collection efficiency varies through the substrate.
AB - The key metric of surface texturing is the short-circuit current J sc. It depends on front surface transmittance, light trapping and the spatial profiles of photogeneration G and collection efficiency c. To take advantage of a one-dimensional profile of c(ζ), where ζ is the shortest distance to the p-n junction, we determine G(ζ) via ray tracing. This permits rigorous optical assessment of common pyramidal textures for various cell designs. When ζ is small, G(ζ) is largest beneath regular inverted pyramids, upright pyramids (regular or random) and planar surfaces, respectively. This higher G(ζ) results in superior collection of generated carriers in front-junction cells. In simulations of a conventional screen-print cell, 92.0% of generated carriers are collected for inverted pyramids, compared to 91.4% for upright pyramids, and 90.0% for a planar surface. Higher efficiency and rear junction devices are analysed in the paper. Despite differences in G(ζ) beneath textures, inverted pyramids achieve the highest J sc for all cell designs examined (marginally so for high-efficiency rear-contact cells) due to superior front surface transmittance and light trapping. We assess a common one-dimensional model for photogeneration beneath textured surfaces. This model underestimates G(ζ) when ζ is small, and overestimates G(ζ) when ζ is large. As a result, the generation current determined is inaccurate for thin substrates. It can be computed to within 3% error for 250 μm thick substrates. However, errors in G(ζ) can lead to 7.5% inaccuracy in calculations of J sc. Errors are largest for lower efficiency designs, in which collection efficiency varies through the substrate.
KW - generation profile
KW - optics
KW - ray tracing
KW - spatial collection efficiency
KW - texture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855315778&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pip.1109
DO - 10.1002/pip.1109
M3 - Article
SN - 1062-7995
VL - 20
SP - 51
EP - 61
JO - Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
JF - Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
IS - 1
ER -