Options for Prosecuting Russian Aggression Against Ukraine: A Critical Analysis

Kevin Jon Heller*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the wake of Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, there is broad consensus - at least in the Global North - that Russian leaders must be prosecuted for the crime of aggression. That consensus, however, does not extend to how Russian aggression should be prosecuted. Some commentators argue that the International Criminal Court (ICC) is the most appropriate forum, even if enlivening the Court’s jurisdiction requires amending the Rome Statute. Others call either for an ad hoc international tribunal similar to the ICTY and ICTR or for a hybrid tribunal based in the Ukrainian judicial system and supported by the Council of Europe. And still others advocate for national prosecutions conducted by Ukraine itself or by third states that have universal jurisdiction over aggression.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Genocide Research
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Options for Prosecuting Russian Aggression Against Ukraine: A Critical Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this