TY - JOUR
T1 - Options for Prosecuting Russian Aggression Against Ukraine
T2 - A Critical Analysis
AU - Heller, Kevin Jon
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - In the wake of Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, there is broad consensus - at least in the Global North - that Russian leaders must be prosecuted for the crime of aggression. That consensus, however, does not extend to how Russian aggression should be prosecuted. Some commentators argue that the International Criminal Court (ICC) is the most appropriate forum, even if enlivening the Court’s jurisdiction requires amending the Rome Statute. Others call either for an ad hoc international tribunal similar to the ICTY and ICTR or for a hybrid tribunal based in the Ukrainian judicial system and supported by the Council of Europe. And still others advocate for national prosecutions conducted by Ukraine itself or by third states that have universal jurisdiction over aggression.
AB - In the wake of Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, there is broad consensus - at least in the Global North - that Russian leaders must be prosecuted for the crime of aggression. That consensus, however, does not extend to how Russian aggression should be prosecuted. Some commentators argue that the International Criminal Court (ICC) is the most appropriate forum, even if enlivening the Court’s jurisdiction requires amending the Rome Statute. Others call either for an ad hoc international tribunal similar to the ICTY and ICTR or for a hybrid tribunal based in the Ukrainian judicial system and supported by the Council of Europe. And still others advocate for national prosecutions conducted by Ukraine itself or by third states that have universal jurisdiction over aggression.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133521832&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14623528.2022.2095094
DO - 10.1080/14623528.2022.2095094
M3 - Article
SN - 1462-3528
VL - 26
SP - 1
EP - 24
JO - Journal of Genocide Research
JF - Journal of Genocide Research
IS - 1
ER -