Abstract
In naming drawings of complex common objects, unpracticed naming times increase with rotation away from the upright, but this orientation effect is attenuated with practice. In principle, attenuation could result from learning to extract orientation-invariant information or from learning view-specific representations at the trained orientations. We contrasted these approaches by examining repetition priming for prime-target pairs presented on successive trials in either the same orientation (horse at 51° primes horse at 51°) or a different orientation (horse at 154° primes horse at 51°), for two subgroups of subjects. One subgroup showed no orientation effect, even when unpracticed, and a correspondingly high generalization of priming across different views. The other subgroup initially showed high sensitivity to misorientation and little priming across orientations but, with sufficient practice, came to show no orientation effect and complete generalization of priming. Thus, some subjects always used orientation-invariant procedures, whereas others learned to do so.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1590-1603 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Perception and Psychophysics |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 1999 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Orientation invariance in naming rotated objects: Individual differences and repetition priming'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver