Orogenesis in Paleo-Mesoproterozoic Eastern Australia: A response to Arc-Continent and Continent-Continent Collision During Assembly of the Nuna Supercontinent

G. M. Gibson*, D. C. Champion, D. L. Huston, I. W. Withnall

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Northern and southern Australia preserve a common record of 1790–1655 Ma intracontinental rifting and backarc extension culminating in formation of a marginal sea that subsequently collapsed following a 1650–1640 Ma reversal in plate motion and onset of arc-continent collision. Arc-continent collision was accompanied by intermediate-pressure Barrovian-type metamorphism (6–8 kb) and widespread crustal thickening as reflected in a clockwise pressure-temperature-time path. Later metamorphism during the 1620–1580 Ma Isa and Olary orogenies occurred under intrusion-enhanced lower pressure conditions (4–6 kb) and followed a counterclockwise pressure-temperature-time path incompatible with either significant amounts of crustal thickening or tectonic models which have Australia and Laurentia commencing collision at this time. Continent-continent collision more likely followed on closely behind arc-continent collision (Riversleigh Tectonic Event), precipitating a switch in crustal shortening from northeast-southwest to west-east as the older rift template and underlying basement structures were reactivated in a transpressive or multicollisional tectonic regime not unlike that which produced the Himalayan-Tibet orogenic system. As in the latter, ongoing collision was accommodated by thrusting, extensional collapse and lateral extrusion of still thermally weak crust on orogen-parallel strike-slip faults, resulting in formation of the west-east-striking Isa Superbasin, isothermal decompression and granite intrusion from 1620 Ma. A comparable record of deformation, metamorphism, and magmatic intrusion from 1650 until 1600 Ma has been documented for northern and southern North America (Forward/Racklan and Mazatzal orogenies) indicating that Laurentia and Australia were likely proximal to each other throughout this period.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere2019TC005717
    JournalTectonics
    Volume39
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Orogenesis in Paleo-Mesoproterozoic Eastern Australia: A response to Arc-Continent and Continent-Continent Collision During Assembly of the Nuna Supercontinent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this