Abstract
The paper compares the management outcomes with a total allowable catch (TAC) and a total allowable effort (TAE) in a fishery under uncertainty. Using a dynamic programming model with multiple uncertainties and estimated growth, harvest, and effort functions from one of the world's largest fisheries, the relative economic and biological benefits of a TAC and TAE are compared and contrasted in a stochastic environment. This approach provides a decision and modeling framework to compare instruments and achieve desired management goals. A key finding is that neither instrument is always preferred in a world of uncertainty and that regulator's risk aversion and weighting in terms of expected net profits and biomass, and the trade-offs in terms of expected values and variance determine instrument choice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 212-236 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Natural Resource Modeling |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Output versus input controls under uncertainty: The case of a fishery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver