Pain, Care, and the Body: A Response to de Vignemont

Colin Klein

doi:10.1080/00048402.2016.1251478

Pain, Care, and the Body: A Response to de Vignemont

Colin Klein^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Frédérique de Vignemont argues on the basis of several empirical counterexamples that Bain and Klein are wrong about the relationship between pain and bodily care. I argue that the force of the putative counterexamples is weak. Properly understood, the association between pain and care is preserved in a way that is consistent with both de Vignemont's own views and the empirical facts.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	588-593
Number of pages	6
Journal	Australasian Journal of Philosophy
Volume	95
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2016.1251478
Publication status	Published - 3 Jul 2017
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1080/00048402.2016.1251478

Cite this

@article{501ae9a4c9af465d8edbf5072df0b62d,

title = "Pain, Care, and the Body: A Response to de Vignemont",

abstract = "Fr{\'e}d{\'e}rique de Vignemont argues on the basis of several empirical counterexamples that Bain and Klein are wrong about the relationship between pain and bodily care. I argue that the force of the putative counterexamples is weak. Properly understood, the association between pain and care is preserved in a way that is consistent with both de Vignemont's own views and the empirical facts.",

keywords = "bodily care, bodily representation, pain, pain asymbolia, somatoparaphrenia",

author = "Colin Klein",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Australasian Association of Philosophy.",

year = "2017",

month = jul,

day = "3",

doi = "10.1080/00048402.2016.1251478",

language = "English",

volume = "95",

pages = "588--593",

journal = "Australasian Journal of Philosophy",

issn = "0004-8402",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pain, Care, and the Body

T2 - A Response to de Vignemont

AU - Klein, Colin

PY - 2017/7/3

Y1 - 2017/7/3

N2 - Frédérique de Vignemont argues on the basis of several empirical counterexamples that Bain and Klein are wrong about the relationship between pain and bodily care. I argue that the force of the putative counterexamples is weak. Properly understood, the association between pain and care is preserved in a way that is consistent with both de Vignemont's own views and the empirical facts.

AB - Frédérique de Vignemont argues on the basis of several empirical counterexamples that Bain and Klein are wrong about the relationship between pain and bodily care. I argue that the force of the putative counterexamples is weak. Properly understood, the association between pain and care is preserved in a way that is consistent with both de Vignemont's own views and the empirical facts.

KW - bodily care

KW - bodily representation

KW - pain

KW - pain asymbolia

KW - somatoparaphrenia

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84994181321

U2 - 10.1080/00048402.2016.1251478

DO - 10.1080/00048402.2016.1251478

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0004-8402

VL - 95

SP - 588

EP - 593

JO - Australasian Journal of Philosophy

JF - Australasian Journal of Philosophy

IS - 3

ER -

Pain, Care, and the Body: A Response to de Vignemont

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this