TY - JOUR
T1 - Pandemics and Economic Activity
T2 - A Framework for Policy Analysis
AU - Flaschel, Peter
AU - Galanis, Giorgos
AU - Tavani, Daniele
AU - Veneziani, Roberto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2022 P. Flaschel, G. Galanis, D. Tavani and R. Veneziani.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This paper studies the interaction between epidemiological dynamics and the dynamics of economic activity in a simple model in the structuralist/post-Keynesian tradition. On the one hand, rising economic activity increases the contact rate and therefore the probability of exposure to a virus. On the other hand, rising infection lowers economic activity through both supply and demand channels. The resulting framework is well-suited for policy analysis through numerical exercises. We show that, first, laissez-faire gives rise to sharp fluctuations in activity and infections before herd immunity is achieved. Second, absent any restrictions on economic activity, physical distancing measures have rather limited mitigating effects. Third, lockdowns are effective, especially at reducing death rates while buying time before a vaccine is widely rolled out, at the cost of a slightly more pronounced downturn in economic activity compared with alternative policies. This casts some doubt on the so-called “lives versus livelihood” policy trade-off. However, we also highlight the importance of policies aimed at mitigating the effects of the epidemic on workers’ income.
AB - This paper studies the interaction between epidemiological dynamics and the dynamics of economic activity in a simple model in the structuralist/post-Keynesian tradition. On the one hand, rising economic activity increases the contact rate and therefore the probability of exposure to a virus. On the other hand, rising infection lowers economic activity through both supply and demand channels. The resulting framework is well-suited for policy analysis through numerical exercises. We show that, first, laissez-faire gives rise to sharp fluctuations in activity and infections before herd immunity is achieved. Second, absent any restrictions on economic activity, physical distancing measures have rather limited mitigating effects. Third, lockdowns are effective, especially at reducing death rates while buying time before a vaccine is widely rolled out, at the cost of a slightly more pronounced downturn in economic activity compared with alternative policies. This casts some doubt on the so-called “lives versus livelihood” policy trade-off. However, we also highlight the importance of policies aimed at mitigating the effects of the epidemic on workers’ income.
KW - COVID-19
KW - distribution
KW - economic activity
KW - pandemic
KW - public policy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131679629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1561/105.00000150
DO - 10.1561/105.00000150
M3 - Article
SN - 2326-6198
VL - 9
SP - 1
EP - 44
JO - Review of Behavioral Economics
JF - Review of Behavioral Economics
IS - 1
ER -